List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.
Elements describe the essential outcomes. | Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. |
1 | Define the benefit received by the customer | 1.1 | Select an existing or potential new product for analysis. |
| 1.2 | Determine who the customers are for the product. |
| 1.3 | Determine uses of product by customers. |
| 1.4 | Analyse the benefits received by the customer from using the product. |
| 1.5 | Define and rank the benefits received. |
| 1.6 | Validate benefits in an appropriate manner. |
|
2 | Develop alternative ways of delivering benefit | 2.1 | Brainstorm alternative methods of delivering required benefits. |
| 2.2 | Brainstorm related benefits which may also be able to be delivered. |
| 2.3 | Analyse sustainability impacts of each alternative. |
| 2.4 | Consult with relevant stakeholders, as appropriate. |
| 2.5 | Rank alternatives by sustainability. |
| 2.6 | Prepare an initial business case for top ranked alternatives. |
|
3 | Develop product and process design | 3.1 | Develop product design specification for alternatives most likely to be implemented. |
| 3.2 | Determine likely production process for alternatives most likely to be implemented. |
| 3.3 | Analyse life cycle sustainability for alternatives most likely to be implemented. |
| 3.4 | Select alternative to develop. |
| 3.5 | Consult with relevant stakeholders, as appropriate. |
| 3.6 | Confirm selected alternative does deliver key customer benefits. |
|
4 | Confirm design for selected alternative | 4.1 | Develop and document product specification. |
| 4.2 | Develop and document key production process parameters. |
| 4.3 | Consult with relevant stakeholders, as appropriate. |
| 4.4 | Prepare business case for implementing selected alternative. |
| 4.5 | Negotiate solutions to value chain issues caused by changed design. |
|
5 | Communicate required responses as appropriate | 5.1 | Identify what communications are required and to whom. |
| 5.2 | Prepare appropriate reports and recommendations. |
| 5.3 | Pitch reports and recommendations, as appropriate. |
| 5.4 | Brief appropriate persons as required by determined responses. |
| 5.5 | Finalise appropriate recording. |
Evidence required to demonstrate competence in this unit must be relevant to and satisfy the requirements of the elements and performance criteria and include the ability, for one (1) or more existing or potential new product, to:
determine customer benefit
identify and rank alternative ways of providing that benefit
specify preferred, sustainable alternative
communicate the above, as appropriate.
Must provide evidence that demonstrates sufficient knowledge to interact with relevant personnel and be able to design/redesign a product to improve its sustainability including knowledge of:
process and changes which occur at each step in selected value chain
principles of sustainability
sustainability impacts at different points in the value chain
principles of sustainable design
the sustainability hierarchy
sources and transport of materials and components and alternatives
processes for producing products, and alternatives
life cycle analysis techniques
hierarchy of hazard control and its application to sustainability hazards
relevant legislation, regulation and protocols, government incentives and other initiatives
risk analysis and its application to sustainability risks.
The unit should be assessed holistically and the judgement of competence shall be based on a holistic assessment of the evidence.
The collection of performance evidence is best done from a report and/or folio of evidence drawn from:
a single project which provides sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria
multiple smaller projects which together provide sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria.
A third party report, or similar, may be needed to testify to the work done by the individual, particularly when the project has been done as part of a project team.
Assessment should use a real project where the design specification for a sustainable/more sustainable product is developed for an operational workplace.
Knowledge evidence may be collected concurrently with performance evidence or through an independent process such as workbooks, written assessments or interviews (provided a record is kept).
Assessment processes and techniques must be appropriate to the language, literacy and numeracy requirements of the work being performed and the needs of the candidate.
Conditions for assessment must include access to all tools, equipment, materials and documentation required including relevant workplace procedures, product and manufacturing specifications associated with this unit.
Foundation skills are integral to competent performance of the unit and should not be assessed separately.
Assessors must satisfy the assessor competency requirements that are in place at the time of the assessment as set by the VET regulator.
The assessor must demonstrate both technical competency and currency.
Technical competence can be demonstrated through:
relevant VET or other qualification/Statement of Attainment AND/OR
relevant workplace experience
Currency can be demonstrated through:
performing the competency being assessed as part of current employment OR
having consulted with an organisation providing relevant environmental monitoring, management or technology services about performing the competency being assessed within the last twelve months.